Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | anonfordays's commentslogin

>You believe a state propaganda feed? In 2025??

"Trust the experts!"

>Much more likely? 450 koreans working here legally but not carrying papers on them because american is supposed to be a free country.

The facts will inevitably be: hundreds of Korean nationals were illegally working in the US. The correction will be a small blurb somewhere, posted months from now, after the next fake new outrage comes about.


> "Trust the experts!"

Trust the experts only makes sense if you’re talking about something where experts exist, and are speaking.

ICE et all is a goon squad, and most of their employees have only a high school diploma and a few months experience driving around in white vans disappearing seniors. If i need that done, i know who to trust. If i need the truth? They are not experts in the truth.

But ok, let’s say we believe them. By their own stats, 30% of the people they arrest are let go without charges or deportation. So by their own accounting, 450 arrests will be 315 deportation/incarcerations, and 135 people treated like cattle for having the wrong skin color or an accent. And given the complete lack of due process why on earth should we even believe them about the 315?


Given all that has happened in the past 220+ days it is more probable that the real underlying truth will be this is a targeted raid to either enact revenge upon Georgia for not playing ball with Trump v1.0, and/or to exert pressure on Hyundai and South Korea to squeeze more juice.


Both can be true: this can be a targeted raid by an administration obsessed with petrol powered vehicles, and the Korean workers are working illegally.


You gonna harvest the cotton bro?

Emancipated and freed up slaves during peak harvest season. Genius move right there.


Lol nice one big dog you totally got me


No need to be any more specific. The only mass migration into the country over the past decade that appeared to be facilitated by the last admimistration was an illegal one.


>That's 38x more money.

Rust gets at least a 1000x more usage than Zig, so their infrastructure costs are not as bad in comparison.


> Rust gets at least a 1000x more usage than Zig

1. I highly doubt your ballpark estimate.

2. I don't think CIs care that much how many users a language has, they care about the number of computations they need to run for each commit/merge.


I don’t think that ballpark estimate is that far fetched? Usage isn’t a reflection of the merits of the two languages. Rust is simply older. It reached 1.0 10 years ago, and it is further along the adoption curve. Zig is yet to reach 1.0 and has mostly early adopters like bun, TigerBeetle and ghostty. I have no doubt that usage will substantially increase once Zig reaches 1.0.

To give you a sense of Rust’s growth, check out this proxy for usage (https://lib.rs/stats). Usage roughly doubled each year for 10 years. 2^10 = 1,024. It’s possible Zig could manage a similar adoption rate after reaching 1.0, but right now it’s probably where Rust was in 2015.

> CIs don’t scale with the number of users

Each Rust release involves a crater run, where they try to compile every open source Rust repo to check for regressions. This costs money and scales with the number of repos out there. But it is true, this only happens once in 6 weeks.

But I think the factor that makes a bigger difference is that Rusts code bases are larger and CI takes longer to run on each commit.


> is that Rusts code bases are larger

And Rust compilations are much slower too.


crater runs are constantly running [1]. Every time there is a PR with any danger of causing a regression a crater run can be requested.

[1]: https://crater.rust-lang.org/


My mistake, sorry!


1000x seems low to me.

Rust is used in production by many companies out there.


Pump jacks use an order of magnitude less space.


A) that’s simply untrue. Solar panels and wind turbines don’t use up the land. You can grow crops and graze under the panels and the wind turbine is mostly in the sky.

B) solar panels and wind turbines tend not to spill toxic waste into the ground around them. And tend not to be put up on your own land without your consent.


>A) that’s simply untrue.

Wrong, it's simply true. Solar panels use land poorly, the MW per unit area is poor.

>You can grow crops and graze under the panels

Agrovoltaics accounts for less than 0.5% of commercial solar installations in rural lands. Effectively no one is doing this, it's not cost effective. You can't fit tractors/combines between the panels.

>And tend not to be put up on your own land without your consent.

What do you mean? No one is putting pump jacks on property without the owners consent.


Than a wind turbine? Not sure that's true


Wind turbines have a bigger base than pumpjacks, but both are frequently scattered across west texas farm and cattle fields. Solar wouldn't be as economical as far as space goes. But you go a little further west and that's arid desert which prob should be fine for solar.


Not sure why you're being downvoted, but for the people in the back: "Open source is not a business model!" As RMS has stated on multiple occasions, it's not a business model and has never been a business model. It is a model to enshrine software freedoms. Nothing more, nothing less.


There's a reason why some call MIT/BSD licenses "cuck licenses." If you don't want others to profit off your hard work... don't pick a license that lets other profit off your work...


Linking a know pedo's personal blog... Wow. If pedos hate hyprland, it's likely because hyprland is doing something right.


Reminds me lf that dev that sent $100k worth of coins to the wrong smart contract address and was never able to get them back.


Lots of examples, but you thinking of this one?

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/6ettq5/statement_...

Was $13m at the time, 8y ago. US$288m today.


>Who is opposing the terms allow/deny and why?

I am. As a BIPOC, we've been denied rights since the founding of the US. When I read "denylist," I can see my ancestors there, on a list to be denied the right to vote. It's not inclusive to use words like "deny" in the capacity of denying access to things.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: