Utter bullshit engineered to convince students not to do drugs. Adderall doesn't make you magically better at solving the knapsack problem, it's not NZT-48 from Limitless. That's not why anyone takes it.
The two most helpful things with SQL are (1) always use set-based operations (never a cursor) and (2) break up your queries into smallest possible reusable chunks (CTEs). Sprinkle in tests to taste. Without some discipline SQL can get out of hand. This is what made dbt popular.
Can you share more detail? Every pain point I've seen can be handled by a more suitable/performant/flexible DB and/or software that makes working with SQL less painful.
True. And it's even worse than that, because each test probably gets "talked about" a lot in various places. And people come up with variants. And those variants get ingested. And then the whole thing becomes a mess.
This was noticeable with the early Phi models. They were originally trained fully on synthetic data (cool experiment tbh) but the downside was that GPT3 / 4 was "distilling" benchmarks "hacks" into it. It became aparent when new benchmarks were released, after the published date, and there was one that measured "contamination" of about 20+%. Just from distillation.
But if you listen to Levels' interviews, especially before his Twitter stardom, you will see that he always promotes the find your audience and build to them approach.
your audience is supposed to guide what you're selling. The fundamental belief is getting the audience is harder than building something they want. This part is probably true, while the rest of the ecosystem is garbage and scams
reply