Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | aravindputrevu's commentslogin

So far, less impressive. Hope it gets better.

Would Atlassian be building a agentic version for their AI Coding agent - Rovo.


What a cursed thought.


If that agent does jira stuff instead of me so I don’t have to ever see it again then I am all for it.


It's amazing how good Claude is at interacting with it. Via jq or other CLI tools or MCP.

"Look at Jira and tell me what am I supposed to be working on this week" is a super power


https://www.atlassian.com/platform/remote-mcp-server

You can have your coding agent do it.


Literally no other reason for them to buy this


Isnt this a old news? I'm thinking of Swift Package manager for all the stuff new.


From my experience, about 20-30% of the packages are not working with swiftpm, either because they don't have a Package.swift file, or because it is not compatible with up-to-date developer tools. On many projects, I had to fork a few repositories just to add or fix the swiftpm integration... while their Pod integration has always been working well.


That is the cost of using third party libraries, hardly the fault of either SPM or Cocoapods.


I‘d say it’s 2% now, of the maintained ones? I haven’t seen such a project in a long while now. React Native is the only one I can think of.


We put GPT-5 through our Golden PR Dataset.

Here is the TL;DR

- GPT-5 outperformed Opus-4, Sonnet-4, and OpenAI’s O3 across a battery of 300 varying difficulty, error-diverse pull requests.

- GPT-5 scored highest on our comprehensive test and found 254 out of 300 bugs or 85% where other models found between 200 and 207 – 16% to 22% less.

- On our 25 hardest PRs from our evaluation dataset, GPT-5 achieved the highest ever overall pass rate (77.3%), representing a 190% improvement over Sonnet-4, 132% over Opus-4, and 76% over O3.


I still can't believe how they let Cursor (which is amazing until somepoint) take away all the shine.

This reminds me of "big companies moves slow.." line.


I completely disagree and feel MS would never do it. Not a MS Employee, but they have moved on from such battles.

They should have restricted the Marketplace several years ago, however, they are doing it now.

With C++, they are part of MFC's, they are the legal owners, not like Google vs Oracle in case of Java.

Lastly, with AI Code IDEs I think yes, there is a case, the need for IDE might be very less. Like a steering on a self driving car.


Why should they have restricted the marketplace? It's really annoying imo that they lock vs codium out of the more useful plugins like the SSH remote one. However luckily most only take a setting or two to enable anyway.


ISO C++ has nothing to do with MFC.


So true. I think most people don't realise how hard it is really to build a engine that works.


I'm curious. Is there any value to do these OSS models?

Suddenly after reasoning models, it looks like OSS models have lost their charm


Thee are a lot of open source reasoning models. The true value to local models is privacy and the ability to have the models be uncensored.


OSS model do not have to be local models, and it's not just about privacy, imo.

DeepSeek R1 hosting is out of reach for most, but it being open is a game changer if you are a building a business that needs the SoTA capabilities of such a large model, not because you will necessarily host it yourself, but because you can't be locked out of using it.

If you build your business on top of OpenAI, and they decide they don't like you, they can shut you down. If you use an open model like R1, you always have the option to self host even if it can be costly, and not be at the mercy of a third party being able to just kill your business by shutting down your access to their service.


Another benefit is they can be fine tuned. Also it's not only about if Openai will shut you down but decide to deprecate model (like they will do for gpt4.0) or swap the name for different model (like sonnet 3.5 did) or censure it or limit capability.


You can absolutely be locked out effectively if they stop releasing upgrades while the other providers move forward.


Uncensored at inference time does not imply uncensored at training time (not a specific comment about Gemma)


You can email me: aravind [at] coderabbit.ai.

We are hiring in BLR and SF.


People have always thoightabputitand said no to cloud. Especially those folks who are non-native tech businesses


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: