Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dadadad100's commentslogin

And Quebec has it’s own English. I spent a few years working in Montreal and soon learned about “passing the vacuum” and “closing the light”. There are so many bilingual folks that concepts and word orders flow back and forth. I had an interesting discussion with a bilingual anglophone about how in English elsewhere it’s called a “pacifier” and not a “souce”


They're literally translating from French to English because they don't know any better. In French you open and close lights and all other electronics... that's just how it works. On and off isn't a thing. So it's not it's own form of English, it's French people making mistakes.


Or “open the road” in reference to removing the snow from the road.


really? its called a soother where I live


I believe it is the case that US (at least) iPhones work as IC cards in Japan

Source - I’m sitting in Kyoto right now having travelled all over Tokyo and then on to Kyoto using only my phone to interact with Japan Rail. Verified with two 16Es and a 12. In fact we were able to add the Suica cards to our phones and charge them fromApplePay while still stateside. That let us skip the Welcome Suica line at Haneda and go straight to the monorail. Highly recommended


A broadly supported tap-to-pay fare system is such an underrated accessibility win for public transit when traveling.

Many tourists already get intimidated by language barriers and inscrutable timetables and transit routes; add tariff complexity (and the chance of getting charged with fare evasion!), and many just end up taking a taxi.

With these stored-value systems, you pretty much don't have to ever worry about doing anything wrong as long as you properly tapped in (and have the necessary cash to top up the card at the exit turnstile if you ended up "overdrafting" your card).

Now the remaining complexity is learning about and getting the card in the first place, and Apple Wallet really does an amazing job there in Japan. Not even having to install an app or create any account is absolutely amazing.


You can now make cards and top up from inside Apple Wallet (even with a non Japanese phone or account)


Yes, it's great! My point is that Apple's implementation solves all these challenges, sorry if that wasn't clear.


Not sure if it's still the case, but last year I could only top up with my AmericanExpress in Apple Wallet. Neither Visa nor MasterCard worked. This was a widespread issue at the time.


FWIW I reloaded the Suica on my iPhone a few times in the past 2-3 weeks using my Apple Card (Mastercard) as the funding source and it worked fine.


I had no issues with either Visa or Mastercard last year, but I believe I went just after that issue was resolved.


Yes, all iPhones and Apple Watches carry the functionality regardless of where you buy them, which has been wonderful for me. The fact that the iOS Wallet app can generate these cards as needed and reload them without a third party app is a cherry on top — so nice to for once get a standardized UI instead of having to deal with some half baked transit service app.


I believe Google is trying to do that with their Wallet/Pay/Wallet app, but I guess it doesn’t support FeliCa yet? They do support some weird card formats, so I guess they have at least some flexibility there – no idea why they can’t add it, too.


This problem seems to also exist for services like uber. Their solution seems easier, drop a pin on a map. Perhaps working so hard to find a textual description is missing the simpler solution.


You are kidding, right? [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem


It was a (not particularly funny) joke.


I thought it was great :)


It was fine. The combination of difficulty detecting humor or sarcasm, a need to geek-preen, and limited filter can sometimes result in unfriendly or unwelcoming comments.


These are FSMs though, as the tape is finite.


If we were to survey 100 PhDs how many would know correctly that Paul Newman had an alcohol problem.


I would hope that 100% of them would be able to figure out how to find out.


Ah, but isn’t that the problem here - asking an LLM for facts without requesting a search is like asking a PhD to answer a question “off the top of your head”. For pop culture questions the PhD likely brings little value.


They should know better than to guess. Educated, honest, intelligent people don't spout off a wild ass guess, if they don't know something they say so.


Much like scanning tools looking for CVEs. There are thousands of devs right this moment chasing alleged vulns. It is early days for all of these tools. Giving papers a look over is an unqualified good as it is for code. I like the approach of keeping it private until the researcher can respond.


Thunderbirds are go!


There is some interesting new working the C4 space at https://likec4.dev/

This is a less prescriptive model than structurizr but keeps the goals of C4


Most software architecture diagrams are a mess ... partly due to ad hoc notation, and partly because it's very unclear what the boxes represent. C4 resolves the latter problem by introducing a small number of predefined abstractions. This sounds limiting, but the power of C4 is that limited set of abstractions, and the conversations it forces architects/developers to have.

The less prescriptive approach of LikeC4 sounds very appealing, because it provides a way to define your own abstractions. But I don't recommend this approach for most teams -> https://c4model.com/abstractions/faq#can-we-add-more-abstrac...


Take a fly on an airliner in MS flight simulator sometime or watch any of the YouTubers that show this stuff. CitationMax is a good one. The screens tell the flight plan, altitudes, traffic, weather, terrain and more. The audio part is, as mentioned above, extremely efficient and shared. The audio is used for clearances from one step to another ( very loosely speaking) This improves everyone’s situational awareness. This may have been an issue at DCA where the commercial flight was on VHF and the chopper was on UHF.

If a plane loses comms there are well defined procedures and everyone knows exactly what that plane will do as they proceed to their destination.


Very good presentation but I do miss any mention of the audience claim. This claim is underrated in my opinion at least. It allows the token to climb access to an api or server or whatever that can be used by gateways to do a high level authorization. Then the scopes can be used at the resource server to govern lower level authorization.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: