Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dissent's commentslogin

STRIPE_KEY I understand because it's an external service that you can't really simulate locally. But DATABASE_URL - why not just default this to localhost, and default the secret to a dummy string? If your workflow doesn't even use secrets in the first place, you can never accidentally commit them.

> I cringed while reading his many comparisons between people of different regions, as if they were species of finches

Only because we know better now. It must have seemed self evident at the time and we can forgive Darwin for making that mistake. He was a scientist and I'm sure he'd have accepted the evidence that all the so-called races are embarrassingly alike.

Not a fan of these retrospective moralistic takes.


This reminds me of the Harvard Implicit Association test, particularly the gender career one. It will tell you if you implicitly associate certain careers with certain genders.

Since the overwhelming majority of, say, auto mechanics, are held by men, associating these roles with men is entirely accurate. Without saying anything of what it "should" be.

If your results were anything else, it suggests some kind of powerful overcompensating counter bias is as play. That your desire to see more gender balance in this role is so great, that you subconsciously already believe it to be normal. The real world is a deviation from where it "should" be. This strikes me as a rather pernicious position. Dogmatic. Almost religious.


You're arguing in favour of OP there.

For most of the past 10 years we've seen the liberal left celebrating this kind of McCarthyism. They normalised it, raised the stakes, and now it's being leveraged by the traditional actors who've always wanted to. Liberal elites should have been a bulwark against this, but they were not.


You're mistaken in your strawmanning of my position.

I'm against the dull left V right shallow simplemindedness dominant in US forums.

I reject the notion that "ostracism mechanisms", especially in a Hollywood context, were recently "pioneered by the left".

I read comments that blather on about "liberal left", "deplorables", et al. and despair for political sanity in the US.

It's an interesting emergance of iterative dynamics that the ancient rules of elections in middle north America resulted in a Hotelling's law two party system, neither broadly representative of US citizens, when those rules were founded by people opposed to party politics who sought robust debate of a multitude of views.


This sounds suspiciously like the "noble savage" myth perpetuated by imperialists during the colonial era. Guessing which context you intended your comment to be read in, I can't help but find that a little ironic.


Some people broke the law, and the poster can be held accountable for successful incitement. It's not the post that broke the law per se.

You can yell fire in a crowded theatre. Just hope you don't cause a panic or you'll be in trouble.


Well, the test is if it's directed to and likely to cause a panic (in the US). So if you avoid causing a panic by sheer luck - like something counteracts your yelling and everybody settles down again, and that's the only reason nobody was crushed - you're still in trouble.

Though moral luck is certainly a thing in general, where negligence and risk-taking is not a crime until it goes wrong.


Aware of the US distinction, and it's mostly sensible. I believe in the US you actually can yell "fire" in a crowded theatre and if nothing happens, you'll be given the benefit of the doubt. As it should be.

Anything else a genuinely slippery slope.


> You can yell fire in a crowded theatre. Just hope you don't cause a panic or you'll be in trouble.

But what if laws get interpreted through an ideological lens, and the person shouting happens to be a fellow member of the "Pro-Trampling Party"?


Then that'll be factored in as intent and they'll be held accountable for the consequences - not the speech itself.

The important part is that yelling "fire" is fine if the entire theatre laughs it off.


I've never set foot in the USA, but from an outsider looking in, it seems like academic integrity was sidelined by ideology during that period. Once this has been normalised, it's not difficult for a competing ideology to move in. Seems like a real shame, but surely this didn't just happen overnight in 2024.


That's not entirely true.

It just moved the work somewhere else, generally an Apache config on a shared host. The user could very often just dump some PHP files in place and they'd be served up, but if you had to set up a new host then it was as fiddly as anything else.

This pattern also meant dropping everything the docroot, using .htaccess to hide things, having different behaviour depending on the global php.ini. All architectures had to be mashed into a request/response cycle (and anything more complex was no longer just drop the files in). It was a very long way from the idea of reproducable builds.

I agree it was popular, but not really for the right reasons.


Oh come on, it was waaay easier for beginners to set up than Java, Python, Ruby,or Perl at the time. Not even comparable.


That's an American legal distinction.

Free Speech is a value


I posit that it’s also a choice. You can choose to curtail your speech or scream it from the rooftops, at any given time. You might sign some kind of agreement with a non-disparagement clause and then decide that you wish to speak out in ways that break that agreement.


Are people, developers included, who feel threatened with the loss of their income to AI, any different to the Luddites?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite

Genuine question. I'm trying to find a difference, but not succeeding.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: