It would work anywhere, but only with small amounts of current. In Germany the max is set to 800W. Won’t affect the grid much and standard wiring can easily handle 800W flowing „backwards“.

Germany has many rented apartments compared to eg the US. If you own a house, those systems make little sense. But for Germany, where many rent an apartment, it’s attractive for many. And the only way for many to ever profit from solar.

But not just for AI, for all their data center operations.

Or, with the wrong weather, nuclear fallout heading towards Moscow.

> The Level 2 engineer was rostered on-call and therefore was not available on site at the time of the failure. Having exhausted remote intervention options, it took 1.5 hours for the individual to arrive on-site to perform the necessary full system re-start which was not possible remotely.

Which shows that sometimes, remote isn't a viable option. If you have very critical infrastructure, it's advisable to have people physically very close to the data center so that they can access the servers if all other options fail. That's valid for aviation as well as for health care, banks, etc. Remote staff just isn't enough in these situations.

Or you configure your infrastructure to be remotely operated.

From the text it sounds like it looked up if a code was in the flight plan and at which position it was in the plan. It never looked up two codes or assumed there code only be one, just comparing how the plan was filed.

I'm sure there'd be a better way to handle this, but it sounds to me like the system failed in a graceful way and acted as specified.

But that wouldn't help you here. The flight plan will come in with the code and you'll still have to resolve that to your keys.

Sure, but that means you are putting in the infrastructure to resolve it, instead of assuming there will never be a need to.

Transferwise makes sense to me. They used to be just about transferring money abroad. By now, they offer full bank accounts including card payments. I guess they dropped the transfer to make people aware that they’re a proper bank now.

And sent back by fax.

I just did a training course and for the ones we used it was still two on the front. Only for children it's front and back.

Likewise in the UK, two on the front, at least for adults. Makes less disruption to CPR if you leave the patient on their back.

As a website owner, I have an incentive to provide access to the Google crawler because of the visitors they send me. They've started to show more content directly, but a fair amount of people still click through to websites.

It looks to me like ChatGPT Search hides links much more. Is there any incentive for website owners to allow access to ChatGPT?

There's still a link, so from a purely rational perspective the small benefit you get from allowing it is bigger than the zero benefit you get from disallowing it.

The calculation would be different if you had a website large enough that excluding it would measurably make the chatgpt search service worse, which is presumably why OpenAI has been willing to pay some large players.