I don't get all of the complaints about the tone of AI chatbots. Honestly I don't care all that much if it's bubbly, professional, jokey, cutesey, sycophantic, maniacal, full of emojis. It's just a tool, the output primarily just has to be functionally useful.
I'm not saying nice user interface design isn't important, but at this point with the technology it just seems less important than discussions about the actual task-solving capabilities of these new releases.
You can't extrapolate from your own experience in that way. There are billions of people having a different experience to you in a multitude of different ways.
Then just don't go? I personally prefer mixed gender spaces but I can understand why some people might prefer single gender spaces. It doesn't mean they necessarily have "an issue".
The diff will tell you what's changed, but it doesn't tell you the "why" of the change. A project should store that information somewhere; whether it's in pull request descriptions, issues/tickets, or the commit message, which is a perfectly reasonable choice.
sure, but in that context there's no ambiguity (and technically, it's not the "times" symbol, that's the cross product symbol). We don't really use "x" in vector maths, it's all "a", "b", "v1", "v2", etc =)
(at best you might use a .x subscript for 3D graphics but when did anyone ever do that by hand)
This comment is ridiculous. What are the units of intelligence? Since when is charming people a trade-off against solving problems? Why do you equate extroversion to charming people?