Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jaynate's commentslogin

It’s sort of difficult to understand why this is even a question - LLM-based / judgment dependent workflows vs script-based / deterministic workflows.

In mapping out the problems that need to be solved with internal workflows, it’s wise to clarify where probabilistic judgments are helpful / required vs. not upfront. If the process is fixed and requires determinism why not just write scripts (code-gen’ed, of course).


This bothered me at first but I think it's about ease of implementation. If you've built a good harness with access to lots of tools, it's very easy to plug in a request like "if the linked PR is approved, please react to the slack message with :checkmark:". For a lot of things I can see how it'd actually be harder to generate a script that uses the APIs correctly than to rely on the LLM to figure it out, and maybe that lets you figure out if it's worth spending an hour automating properly.

Of course the specific example in the post seems like it could be one-shotted pretty easily, so it's a strange motivating example.


It seems easier but in my experience building an internal agent it’s not actually easier long term just slow and error prone and you will find yourself trying to solve prompt and context problems for something that should be both reliable and instantaneous

These days I do everything I can to do straightforward automation and only get the agent involved when it’s impossible to move forward without it


Many of these laws can be applied to any discipline. Business, politics, etc.

My gmail address is first.last@gmail.com. From time to time (and for years) I get someone else’s at firstlast@gmail.com. I thought that a Gmail account that was first.last@gmail also allowed for email sent to firstlast@gmail (no period) to reach my inbox as well.

I’ve received some sensitive/PII content over the years.

I’ve wondered if this person has access to any of my information?

Not necessarily related to this post, but wonder why and how this could happen.


> I’ve wondered if this person has access to any of my information?

No. They have just told someone your email address and that someone has sent you stuff. Anyone can do that, if they dream up your email address. People having the same name are a lot more likely to do that.

Happened to me as well. I was the first one of the 50 people or so carrying my name to register "first[.]last@gmail.com" back in 2004. At least two of my namesakes have since mistakenly used my email address. Some people just aren't very detail-oriented.


I bet this is it.

I have a first.lastname@gmail.com, and my namesake has firstmlastname@gmail.com (with middle initial, and I think they originally created the GMail username without periods).

So, I sometimes receive emails intended for him, by people who saw firstmlastname and think it's firstlastname.

Maybe around a hundred emails so far, over the years.

I've gotten good at telling at a glance that an email is for him, without reading it, and forwarding and deleting.

Fortunately, my namesake is a very accomplished good-guy, so I'm happy to help.


I still control my first name @gmail.com from very early on, but have never been able to put it to use because of the relentless torrent of misdelivered email.


I still own and use mylastname@gmail.com. Yeah I get a ton of misaddressed mail, even some from a relatively famous person with the same last name.


Maybe their email is lastfirst@gmail.com, and people occasionally misremember your address and send your correspondence to them. In that case, yes.

More likely their email address is firstlastnumber@gmail.com or firstlast@otherprovider.com though, in which cases the types of mistakes people make are likely asymmetric.


periods are ignored in gmail addresses so there's no difference between firstlast@gmail.com and first.last@gmail.com


No it isn't.. it's firstlast@gmail.com [Dots don't matter in gmail addresses](https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7436150)


No, I think what's happening is someone else is confused what their email address is. With Gmail, dots are not significant; any email address with dots is equivalent to the email address without any dots. (So you may have signed up as first.last@, but your email address under the hood is really firstlast. You can also send mail to your f.i.r.s.t.l.a.s.t@gmail.com, and it will be delivered to you.)

I expect that someone else with the same name as you occasionally (or all the time) forgets that their actual email address is flast@gmail.com or lastfirst@gmail.com or some other similar combo, and enters your email into signup forms. Or has friends who guessed their email address and got it wrong. Or something.

That other person doesn't have access to your information.


> I thought that a Gmail account that was first.last@gmail also allowed for email sent to firstlast@gmail (no period) to reach my inbox as well.

Yes, and you've received email that was addressed like that ... so what's your issue?

> I’ve wondered if this person has access to any of my information?

Yes, because "this person" is you.


Handy tip for software testing - Gmail ignores everything after a “+” in the address. So when you’re testing different accounts in your software you can use <youremail>+1@gmail.com, <youremail>+2@gmail.com, <youremail>+3@gmail.com etc. to create many different accounts in the software that all go to the same email address.


That's not just a Gmail feature. It's part of RFC 5233. See "Subaddressing."


Indeed, also works at outlook.com / hotmail and others.



Try Pendo instead…


There are revenue recognition rules that govern what Revenue is on the P&L. Same with costs/expenses. But I would say if anything, profits are easier to manipulate than revenue.


Depending on what you’re optimizing for could be revenue (high growth) or Net income per share (lower growth).

Reality is once you’ve established a baseline it’s difficult to move from one to the other or have substantial changes to the negative for either.


Had me hooked right up to this point: “When we get the check, we pay a commission to this representative. Assume the commission is $500.”

I’ve never seen a software company pay 50% commissions on a software sale. I know it’s and example but the percentages are wrong even for the perpetually licensed days. Should be closer to 8-15%.

Totally sales and marketing spend could indeed be higher in this model because autodesk moved to direct positioning with end buyers rather than distributors.


Commissions were different back then. I worked part time selling computers around 1990 and a little earlier, margin on computers was moving down, but was as high as 50%, I recall it moving down to 30% and stabilising there for a while. I don't remember software margins, but it could have been about the same. I used to get 50% of the margin as commission.


When I sold Windows 2.1 at Egghead Software, my spiff was an extra 30% for the first month as a promo. I always assumed that was a loss leader by Microsoft to push extra copies on release.


Hey, and now Apple and Google have set it at 30% again!


I'm pretty sure this is a roughly accurate breakdown of AutoCAD's cost structure 34 years ago. How long have you been in the business, and what was the highest-sticker-price software you were selling?


I am amused to see no response to this comment in two days.


A further consideration here is that this wasn't just commission, but also a payment towards providing support to the customer.


“The transaction positions EA to accelerate innovation and growth to build the future of entertainment.”

Unless some of that cash is staying on the balance sheet, they will NOT be investing in growth and innovation.

PE is not what I normally think of when I think of innovation and (non-financially engineered) growth.


Often, that off-topic content was garbage anyway. Not really deep or helpful or expert in any way. Not always, but often.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: