Meta announced several key updates to enhance building with Llama and strengthen the open-source ecosystem:
1. Llama API Preview: Launched a limited preview of the Llama API, a developer platform simplifying Llama application development with easy API key creation, playgrounds, SDKs, and tools for fine-tuning and evaluation. It emphasizes model portability and privacy.
2. Fast Inference Collaborations: Announced collaborations with Cerebras and Groq to offer developers access to faster Llama model inference speeds via the Llama API.
3. Expanded Llama Stack Integrations: Revealed new and expanded Llama Stack integrations with partners like NVIDIA, IBM, Red Hat, and Dell Technologies to make deploying Llama applications easier for enterprises.
4. New Llama Protection Tools & Program: Released new open-source security tools including Llama Guard 4, LlamaFirewall, and Llama Prompt Guard 2, updated CyberSecEval 4, and announced the Llama Defenders Program for partners to help evaluate system security.
5. Llama Impact Grant Recipients: Announced the 10 international recipients of the second Llama Impact Grants, awarding over $1.5 million USD to support projects using Llama for transformative change.
Overall, the announcements emphasize making Llama more accessible, easier to build with, faster, more secure, and supporting its diverse open-source community.
Just ask the LLM to walk you through each line of code, create an explain the dependency graphs and in a relatively short period of time they’ll know exactly how their code works. Using Claude Code is quite useful for this - I use it on GitHub repositories I’m curious about.
I think the problem is "but why?" What incentive would they have when they just need a brief answer or solution, i.e. just make code do this, get the boss their answer on that, etc.?
It's going to be fun when LLM agents do all the communication for us.
> One of the thorniest questions in the conversion has been how the nonprofit will be valued. Musk’s bid sets a high bar and may mean that he, or whoever runs the nonprofit, would end up with a large and possibly controlling stake in the new OpenAI.
So this is a play to mess with the restructuring?
Why aren't the news stories exploring this angle? It's very annoying that this comes below the regurgitated press releases and asinine Twitter quotes. Reuters didn't even mention it. The Guardian just barely touches on it.
Apparently Pieter Levels:
"
Interior AI now has >99% profit margins
- GPU bill is $200/month for 21,000 designs per month or about 1¢ per render (no character training like Photo AI helps costs)
- Hosted on a shared VPS with my other sites @ $500/mo, but % wise Interior AI is ~$50 of that
+= $250/month in costs
It makes about $45,000 in MRR and so $44,730 is pure profits! It is 100% ran by AI robots, no people
I lead the robots and do product dev but only when necessary"
This guy makes money by selling "how to get rich using AI" courses and marketing himself on social media (which he is phenomenal at). I'm not really inclined to believe his sales numbers.
He is NOT selling any courses. Can you please point me to any of his courses? He has a book he wrote about making software/projects called Make. This book is several years old and doesn't mention AI.
Yeah, he claims because at any point in time there are people redesigning their interiors. I'd say that at any point in time there are people you can convince to give you their money, and if you don't offer refunds, it's not far from a scam.
