Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nikhizzle's commentslogin

I’ve had luck getting higher rate of interviews for remote jobs by applying first. To that end I built a site which shows job postings as they are posted - https://tangerinefeed.net

Great tool! Would be nice to add a simple search feature, too!

I think the interesting thing here for those of us who use open source frameworks is that we can ask the LLM to look at the source to find the answer (eg. Pytorch or Phoenix in my case). For closed source libraries I do not know.

I may eventually get one of these just to use with Claude code. Been looking for the lightest best machine to use with agents.

Maybe dictation is the way to go? It’s a quick way to interact with agents and works really well.

Shellfish on iOS to ssh into a vps with tmux with Gemini-cli, lazygit and neovim worked quite well for me.

The clicks keyboard does not have ctrl, arrows, page up, down or really any special keys so I’m not sure it would be that much more pleasant. I know iOS keyboard has been quite meh in the recent releases but for thumb typing I’m not convinced that physical keyboard are superior.


sample output here - https://www.science.org/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.112...

This is at the very beginning of begin feasible. I do not know anything about photonics, maybe someone who does can comment on scalability?


The raw materials: diffractive optical elements and single mode fibers from a materials perspective are all quite easy to manufacture. The primarily limitation with miniaturization is the single-mode fibers, which are limited by the optical wavelength you are using and the index of the fiber. For a conventional silica optical fiber, this is probably around ~100 nm diameter at a minimum. Newer materials can definitely change this 2-3x, but I'm not aware of anything more fundamental.

So in general this would be something that you would potentially be able to see in cars, but unlikely consumer electronics or handhelds without a modification in the operational principle (eg time-multiplexing to reduce the required number of fibers).

My personal opinion is that competing on low-power and small-scale is a lost cause for photonic computing. In terms of absolute energy efficiency and absolute miniaturization, photonics will never win. But at larger energy scales and larger systems, photonics can reach a regime where higher parallel throughput will dominate.


Thanks for sharing this. Needed something meaningful this morning.


You're welcome. He also remained in contact with his crew until their deaths.


Armchair economist here - one implication of this is that a crypto liquidation will cause global interest rates to spike at a time when they will need to be lower to calm the markets.

Selling massive amounts of debt with no additional demand means the required return must be higher.


Stablecoins are now a regulated industry with laws in place to address this very concern. Tether is currently not compliant, but as the largest player in the space, has a great incentive to maintain its dominance.


Regulated industry.. like banking, stocks, and mortgage origination!


What would the regulation ... enforce?

Some sort of behavior by Tether and others?


Regulators also have enforcement functions.

Are you asking how laws work?


I’m just curious what is being enforced to prevent what exactly.

I think I’m missing what scenario people are thinking of in general.


I'm not sure I see that, depending what you mean by crypto liquidation. If you mean the prices of dogecoin etc. falling then that mostly just effects the number of Tethers changing hands between one speculator and another and wouldn't really affect the bond market.

If you mean Tether holders redeeming them for US dollars, that would involve selling treasuries but I doubt it would drive the price down that much. That's a very liquid market.


I mean tether redemptions. Hedge funds liquidating treasuries last year significantly distorted yields for a short while.


Good point but it seems like Tether is very healthy, it has the double of daily volume than Bitcoin now and doesn't really depend on crypto rails [1].

[1] Stable Coins ⊄ Blockchains: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/stable-coins-blockchains-seba...


that's very armchair indeed

a crypto liquidation results in more people going to Tether. "tethered" and "tethering" has been a verb in the crypto space for like 10 years

when market demand of tether is too great the value goes about $1.00 and the organization relies on arbitragers to deposit more to cause the minting of Tethers at $1.00 and selling it into the open market if the price is above $1.00 pushing the market rate back down to $1.00

Tethers in existence still continue to grow in that scenario

Its nearly 1:1 backing, most of the time, even a mass redemption event of Tethers will be orderly and fine. those crisis of confidence have alreay occurred, those stress tests have already happened, far faaaar beyond what any bank would survive

all fiat collateralized stablecoins function the same way and there are many case studies, actual events that happened, that show it occurring orderly, uneventfully.


> when market demand of tether is too great the value goes about $1.00 and the organization relies on arbitragers to deposit more to cause the minting of Tethers at $1.00 and selling it into the open market if the price is above $1.00 pushing the market rate back down to $1.00

I'm not sure of this. USDT can only be minted by tether [0] (line 406), hopefully when they acquire more treasuries.

I am not exactly sure where the price of USDT come from and I am pretty sure there is not only one. But I would guess it is an aggregate of the prices on exchanges.

The chainlink oracle [1] is probably the most authoritative one.

- [0] https://etherscan.io/token/0xdac17f958d2ee523a2206206994597c...

- [1] https://data.chain.link/feeds/ethereum/mainnet/usdt-usd


Nobody is “setting the price”, people trade. supply and demand. on many venues and contracts. the oracles just read from those (and sometimes the venues and contracts read from the oracles)

when tethers and trading at $1.04 or anything higher than $1.00

arbitrageurs wire money to their account at the Tether organization (bitfinex, otc services) to instruct the organization to mint Tether

the organization does everything necessary: takes the deposited money and buys US treasuries, mints the equivalent amount of Tethers and gives those tethers to the customer

The customer deposited $1 and received 1 tether. Some exchange venues have people rushing to buy 1 Tether for $1.04

Customer sells their tether to them and has some other form of crypto that they can try to get back into dollars and do it all over again, until flooding the market with Tether supply back to $1.00

this happens all day every day for a decade, more pronounced during panic selling periods


The USA is going to have a fantastic fiscal reputation if/when that has happened.


deleted


The US Treasury market is BY FAR the deepest most liquid market in the world.


The US housing market is the largest market in the world.


Thanks for this, this is very useful for a related ai project I’m working on.


A job feed for remote jobs - https://tangerinefeed.net/

This is something I’ve needed myself over the last few years as jobs become shorter and shorter lived. Keep on improving it as some kind of compulsion.


Looks good! Seems to not be bringing in the requirements section of the JDs?


Thanks! Will take a look.


Ex-Apple File System engineer here who shared an office with the other ZFS lead at the time. Can confirm they link to the wrong profile for Don Brady.

This is the correct person: https://github.com/don-brady

Also can confirm Don is one of the kindest, nicest principal engineer level people I’ve worked with in my career. Always had time to mentor and assist.


Not sure how I fat-fingered Don's LinkedIn, but I'm updating that 9-year-old typo. Agreed that Don is a delight. In the years after this article I got to collaborate more with him, but left Delphix before he joined to work on ZFS.


Given your expertise, any chance you can comment on the risk of data corruption on APFS given that it only checksums metadata?


I moved out of the kernel in 2008 and never went back, so don’t have a wise opinion here which would be current.


I have a rough idea of my friend’s schedules, and I call them when I’m driving the kids around, or we text. Staying in constant contact with a few very close friends about my mental health has floated me through my mid-40s.

A tip I got from a friend in his 60s was that even when you lose friends, life is great because you constantly have the opportunity to find new ones. I am in a new close friends renaissance in my 40s, just be vulnerable and don’t take rejection personally.


I'd definitely be better off if I didn't take rejection personally

But it's hard for me to draw the line between being vulnerable and say, oversharing or dumping


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: