I like the idea but I wonder why every boilerplate it's so expensive. Dude 99 bucks it's a huge amount of money. I think It's even more for non american people. Also If I'm going to release a MVP, I'd go spending as low as possible.

Also there are tools like gpt-pilot, gpt-engineer that automate thr boilerplate part (ok, it's not perfect but gets the job done).

Again, I recognize this is a cool idea, but it's not the first time I see a "boilerplate automator" with a price so high.

Very good alternative, thanks for sharing

Happy to answer any questions about Arcade!

A worth mention, thanks!

Location: Europe

Remote: Yes (Worldwide except China)

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: Java, Spring, Postgres, MongoDB, RabbitMQ, Kafka, GCP, AWS, Docker, K8s, etc

Résumé/CV: LinkedIn.com/in/seupedro

Email: https://veilmail.io/pedro

Full title:

Hydra is a game launcher with its own embedded bittorrent client and a self-managed repack scraper.

HumanEval Benchmark: 95.1 @ GPT-3.5

I wonder if it can be combined with projects like SWE-Agent to build powerful yet opensource coding agents.

- https://paperswithcode.com/sota/code-generation-on-humaneval

- https://github.com/princeton-nlp/SWE-agent

ArXiv Paper:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14619

The AI Human Replacement era has begun.

The great shine of RISC-V is its openness. That's the point when compared to ARM architecture.

I wonder how a truly open project like that could be affected by geopolitics interests, and also, if it would really be effective.

> I wonder how a truly open project like that could be affected by geopolitics interests, and also, if it would really be effective.

Or in this case, the other way around: how open ISA may affect geopolitics.

RISC-V being free-for-all is a given at this point. But politicians-being-stupid also is. So who knows what they come up with.

Export stops on specific high-perf implementations won't do anything. China would just license from elsewhere, or make their own (which they are perfectly capable of doing).

Not to mention it works both ways: what China contributes to the RISC-V ecosystem, also benefits US interests. Frustrating that with export bans, just creates a lot of hostility for near-0 gain. Read: pointless.

Does anyone had a similar experience like that?

I totally understand the abuses described by the author and feel sorry about that. But I wonder how other successful open-source projects survived and eventually became rentable like Vue.js

It doesn't have to be a universal experience for it to be applicable to some. I have no source to cite, but I know this is not the first blog I've read where an open source maintainer has to step away due to abuse from entitled strangers. To your question, I bet it happens more on one person projects, where the person and the project aren't separated as much and where there is no collective to beat down the bad faith comments.