I also recommend the flag for a max release date for $current_date - that basically locks all package versions to that date without a verbose lock file!

(sadly, uv cannot detect the release date of some packages. I'm looking at you, yaml!)

This is way less than what uv and other package managers do:

- dev dependencies (or other groups) - distinguishing between direct and indirect dependencies (useful if you want to cut some fat from a project) - dependencies with optional extra dependencies (if you remove the main, it will delete the orphans when relevant)

It's not unachievable with pip and virtualenvs, but verbose and prone to human error.

Like C: if you're careful enough, it can be memory safe. But teams would rather rely on memory safe languages.

That's hyperbolic. You had high profile celebrities advertising NFTs, and stuff valued at millions, that's a whole other scale.

Skins have their place when they're modestly priced, as they also have quite a modest impact. But the whole gambling, artificial restrictions and trading is quite suspicious indeed.

NFTs failed because organized crime didn't latch onto it like they did CS knives. Only half-joking, the other half is stuff like grey market money conversion as mentioned in another thread.

Late open source, with a double entendre on late.

And AWS has agreements with services with similar services, eg MongoDB. Maybe elasticsearch asked for too much money, or AWS didn't want to pay out of principle.

I tried to program flappy bird on that, back then the delay on Android made it impossible, as you need quick feedback.

Scoping it down and making a side scroller where the characters runs on the floor and only has to jump iver obstacles made it more mearable!

A touchscreen Mac would compete with iPads so that's a no no.

For the foldable phone, it may just have to do with aesthetics.

All the products compete. A foldable phone already competes with iPads. iPad competes with Mac. iPad Mini competes with iPads.

I agree they aren't building great user products anymore but gemini is solid (maybe because it's more an engineering/data achievement than a ux thing? the user controls are basically a chat window).

I asked for a deep research about a topic and it really helped my understanding backed with a lot of sources.

Maybe it helps that their search is getting worse, so Gemini looks better in comparison. But nowadays even kagi seems worse.

Kagi has their own AI assistant that let's you choose any model from the major, and some not so major, providers. You can even hop between them I the same chat. It is also able to search for results using Kagi. This includes any lenses you could configure.

It's worked extremely well for me. Their higher subscription was less than ChatGPT + Kagi. I haven't used Gemini on its own interface yet to compare, though.

In what ways does Kagi seem worse? Any specific examples?

Cool tech, wrong company.

The tech is impressive, but people are already getting concerned about excessive screen time via zombie doomscrolling. Moving it from the pocket to literally in people's face will only worsen it.

And by Meta of all companies, with concerning privacy practices and of course motivated to hold your attention to serve you more ads.