Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | rajington's commentslogin

excellent collection, what's the closest to functional graphql directives you've come across so far? i think directives are really going to unlock the power of graphql, and replace a lot of code with something more declarative


another product that does this with syllables? sure i'd love to understand how sound syncing works


Very intelligent approach! JSX for routes always seemed weird.

I especially like the explicit url parameter passing vs. others where it just magically shows up in your component.


Thanks a lot! That also was one of the main issues I had with React Router and Reach Router.


- TypeScript

JS will eventually support types natively and will be similar to TS/Flow's API. I have more faith in ReasonML taking off than Dart/Flutter but I hope I'm wrong.

- React and React Native, even ReactXP/react-native-web if appropriate

Vue is good but not good enough to convince most of the community and the community makes it. Their native strategy needs more work, and it's too valuable not to have one.

- Apollo Client

So much boilerplate disappears, and it's powerful enough to be your one data source which enforces many best practices and capabilities.

- GraphQL Gateway stitching GraphQL Servers and serverless resolvers

GraphQL/serverless does for the backend via microservices what React did for the frontend via components. The benefits to the entire stack are countless. Apollo Server (even AppSync) make it simple.

- A serverless datastore

There's also many great GraphQL ORMs but managing infrastructure/scaling should be avoided.


Two months with the Pixelbook i7, don't regret investing that much on a Chromebook, which was my main concern. Kept the old MBP just in case and it's been just sitting there, even through tax season.

Pretty happy with performance, Linux apps work well but still "feel" a little out of place. Very like how it runs Android apps, so much works but it's just the issues that DO come up that can be frustrating. If you're not ready for that experience then it might not make sense to switch your main dev machine.

Doubt I'll ever buy a laptop bigger than this one ever again, but it is a little harder to dev directly on this, mainly bc of that MBP trackpad, but this keyboard is MUCH better.



What advantages does your syntax offer over the ICU standard? http://userguide.icu-project.org/formatparse/messages


I had a similar problem previously and considered automating it by comparing frames. It's not easy and would have obvious false positives/negatives, but YouTube does help by publishing key frames and it could at least be used to help rank results.

Take this example music video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vopR3ys8Kw

Frames:

https://img.youtube.com/vi/6vopR3ys8Kw/0.jpg

https://img.youtube.com/vi/6vopR3ys8Kw/1.jpg

https://img.youtube.com/vi/6vopR3ys8Kw/2.jpg

https://img.youtube.com/vi/6vopR3ys8Kw/3.jpg

And this lyrics video version (more interesting because it's SOMEWHAT changing):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoAqHxm5dpo

Frames:

https://img.youtube.com/vi/FoAqHxm5dpo/0.jpg

https://img.youtube.com/vi/FoAqHxm5dpo/1.jpg

https://img.youtube.com/vi/FoAqHxm5dpo/2.jpg

https://img.youtube.com/vi/FoAqHxm5dpo/3.jpg

Simply finding the differences between frames would give the first video a higher score than the second.


I commented on your parent post before reading this...

Nice catch on the thumbnails that YouTube already captures. A histogram comparison between the second and third auto-generated thumbnails from the lyrics video was mostly equivalent when I ran one. That would be a good sign that it's not the actual music video.


I see us at the beginning of a path that grants magic powers, controlling everything with our voice, or even our intention.

That requires machine learning, which requires data, which requires data collection, and the closest one to Google there isn't Apple or Amazon, it's Facebook.


This is worthy of a bug bounty, and I feel it should be handled as such: reported privately to them first. The people trying to hack reCaptcha at scale are not good people.

The temporary fix Google might have to do in the mean time however is to stop all audio reCaptchas, blocking the people who vitally depend on it.


Blocking audio means blocking visually impaired people from accessing websites with reCAPTCHA.

Hacking reCAPTCHA is not only for bad people. There are several use cases where solving reCAPTCHA automatically is needed.


What are these legitimate use cases for automatic reCAPTCHA solving?


Automating searches on a government website that decided to use reCAPTCHA just because it wants to look modern. There are dozens of them in Brazil for example.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: