Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | romanovcode's commentslogin

`spotdl download "https://open.spotify.com/user/{username}" --user-auth --output '{list-name}/{title} - {artists}.{output-ext}'`

This is literally all you need to back up Spotify.


spotdl downloads from YouTube, not Spotify, afaik

Yeah, but that is the whole point of Claude. And that's why we are interested in the comparison.


I gotta say - processing video at 10fps is very impressive.


It's kind of scary that in a way future of gaming is in the hands of one man (who is getting old btw).

When Gabe is gone I cringe thinking MS will do everything in their power to buy Valve and turn it to complete shit couple years later.


Intel i7, 1tb ssd, 32gb ram and 3070 can fit in ITX which would be MUCH better performance than the steam box for games.

Only downside is you have to install Windows of course.


I haven't checked in detail, but I would suppose SteamOS isn't far off from running on general-purpose PCs. Else, I've heard a lot of good things about Bazzite.


Nvidia drivers leave a bit to be desired on Linux imo. I’ve got an all AMD HTPC right now and bazzite is terrific.


SteamOS does run on regular PC’s I believe unless something has changed?


Why do you have to install Windows? You could put bazzite or any other distro of your choosing on this machine and have a similar experience to the official Steam Machine.


I thought bazzite wasn't running against nvidia yet?


It may not, but that doesn't mean you need to install Windows. Any distro that packages Steam and the Nvidia driver will work.

EDIT: It appears to be supported for RTX 20xx and newer GPUs.

https://www.reddit.com/r/linux_gaming/s/UHQ0ZiW0BX


Where is the comparison with Sonnet 4.5? That would be the only thing that matters, really.


> "Best Frontier" includes GPT-5 and Sonnet 4.5, which both outperform Composer.


>> "Best Frontier" includes GPT-5 and Sonnet 4.5, which both outperform Composer.

Looking at the graph, it would appear there's an implicit "today" in that statement, as they do appear poised to equal or surpass Sonnet 4.5 on that same benchmark in the near future.


What Cursor is really emphasizing here is speed — they’re claiming it runs about four times faster than GPT-5/Sonnet, while still offering roughly the same level of performance.


Does anyone code with GPT-5? I've never had it work in Cursor. I mean, like, at all.


A lot of people use it! It scores very well on our benchmarks, significantly better than Composer-1.


Using Java/.NET with server side rendered HTML + webpack/react for dynamic components (which nearly are non-existent with modern CSS).

Works great.


It entirely depends on the type of application you are building. Boring CRUD app that is rarely updated? Yea, server rendering is probably enough.

But the requirements of "modern" software are always changing. Sure, the static table might be enough, but then some business person says, "It sure would be nice if I could check a little box in the table row or assign this user here..." and now you're adding little JS hacks. Again, not impossible, but at a certain scale, the ability to have infinite access to client driven reactivity becomes a real business empowerment.

Given the interest in the JS working group to add reactive Signals to the core language, I suspect this will only become _more_ prevalent in the future. Maybe it will need less input from frameworks to do the same work and we can move back towards using built-in browser APIs, but the programming model itself works really well (so much so that SwiftUI uses a very similar reactive UI programming model).

Again, I don't disagree with your point, just at a certain scale, it becomes a huge hassle to maintain. If people are going to use these tools and frameworks anyway, it helps the entire web to make them more efficient.


Hmm but that table would be actually what I would write in React most likely. Considering most tables want pagination, filtering and so on it would be dumb to use query-string params and reload the page. So this would actually fit perfectly.

I have this set-up where .NET ViewHelper would do `RenderReactComponent('complexTableComponent', '.complex-table-component')` and it would load bundled react as 1st script and then this component as second script. If page does not need no react components it does not load any. If you have more than one it will still load the react itself only once. It is really amazingly working very, very well.

And yes, if I would to build some kind of dashboard/email client or something I would say use React or Angular and API. But for regular website rendered HTML is king.


Same here, since 2001.

It pains me that so many SaaS go for Next.js based SDKs, but at least it is the closest to Spring/Quarkus/ASP.NET in spirit.


If I had my way I would still be writing ASP.NET WebForms, but the market decided to move. I don't even know if it still works.

Hot take but: it took 20 years for Next.js to catch up to 10% of WebForms offered.

But if people want whatever Next.js offers to build their copycat SaaS with shadcn/ui, so who am I to argue.


Kind of frustrating to watch indeed. Have similar complaints for GUI apps on the desktop, really feels we went backwards from building great GUIs in 10 minutes using WYSIWYG to never really seeing the GUI until it compiles a bunch of XML and you somehow hope it will match what is needed.

Productivity is now wasted trying to make sure that buttons work when pressed or scratching the heads why box is not aligned with another programatically.


> if people want

You mean many developers want. Actual customers, the ones who pay for your work don't even know what Next.js is and are extremely happy with whatever works. The hard part is to sell the idea that - no, next.js is not the best for your SEO heavy website :)


Actually it’s what founders want, technical and non-technical ones.

I’ve been in situations where a non-technical founder asked me to use Angular just to fit in.

With technology becoming about trends, clueless founders more and more are pushing for certain technologies.

Recruitment and developers just follow.


I try but continue to be enable of developing complex code in javascript.

It is so different when compared to Java/.NET where organizing large code blocks and making sure the pieces work well together is so easy. Very frustrating as there is so much that can be done on a browser but hampered by a development environment not much different from only using a text editor.


> Scary stuff.

Why? When jQuery went away nothing happened. People just learned the new frameworks.


I don't think jQuery went away.

And it might never unless browsers implement better DOM apis.

The current DOM API implementation reminds me of that quote:

"look what they need to mimic a fraction of our power"


Yes, it works great, actually. But you have to have specific hardware, for example AMD gpu instead of Nvidia.

Also, nearly anything with anti-cheat (many online games, esp shooters) won't work.


Nvidia works great, and has since this summer. So long as you’re on a recent release you shouldn’t have issues.

Nvidia on a machine with an AMD iGPU requires you to blacklist the amdgpu module.


Nobody tell my machine that. I have a 5080 paired with an 9800X3D, no blacklisting of kernel modules necessary (for me at least).


I should have added “sometimes”. It worked fine that way with most games (I have the same CPU), but Cyberpunk 2099 in particular really doesn’t like that configuration.


Do not underestimate enterprise customers who buy Cursor for all their employees. Cursor will become legacy tech soon, yes. But it will be slow death, not a crash.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: