Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sccomps's commentslogin

Awesome components library. Well done! I might definitely try it in one of my next projects.


I’m at a crossroads with my Speed Cubing Competitions listing app (SCComps.com). It’s an iOS app built in Flutter, has around 250 downloads, and currently generates no revenue. I'm spending about $500 a year just to keep it running. There’s little community engagement, and I'm debating whether to double down and rebuild it in Swift—or just shut it down altogether.


I am working on a free mobile app for speed cubers. you can download the ios version at https://sccomps.com/


Instead of engaging with others, you should’ve just stayed bold (or in your own words - foolish) and started the robotics company, pouring in whatever money you could. Sometimes other people are unintentionally demoralizing. Who cares if you’re burning through your own cash? In a few years, it might just turn into something big.


As an agent


It's quite common in India but I guess not widely accepted internationally. If there can be deletion, then why not updation?


What’s next, addition?


There is already a word, Insertion!


that's double plus good.


source?


An article I read I’m having trouble finding again.


> once British

All of its senior executive leadership is still British

https://www.jaguarlandrover.com/leadership


All of its senior executive leadership is still British

Obviously not true.

One of them is German.


As British as the British Royal Family then https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Windsor


Both speak Germanic languages, close enough?


Even better then.


Breaking things isn't ideal, but it's not the worst. What's truly problematic is when everything appears to be functioning perfectly, while underlying issues go unnoticed—exactly the situation in this story.


Moving fast by releasing unreviewed code into critical production paths can lead to breaking things, as this story illustrated.

It’s the same cavalier attitude taken by startups that treat user data and privacy as something to worry about later, someday.


Does it really matter? While it may not adhere strictly to the rules of grammar, it's not so incorrect that it becomes confusing or changes the intended meaning. This is simply how language evolves over time.


I associate that variation specifically with non-native English speakers rather than a language evolution happening among native English speakers.


But you still understand it fine, no?

Why does it matter how you feel about language evolving(especially bringing race into it)?


Non-native English speakers is my favorite race.


I didn't say how I feel about it or anything about race.


Kids born in "native english" change the language too. For example, treat irregular verbs like regular ones. Languages evolve with time, regardless of non-native speakers using it.


Agreed, and I didn't say otherwise.


Yes, it really does matter. The concept that "language evolves" is absolutely valid when you're talking about the introduction of new words and phrases and adapting existing words to new purposes.

It's not the principle to invoke when you're talking about simply making logical mistakes. A question mark is used at the end of a question, not a statement. "How it works" is a statement. "How does it work?" would be the way to word the same CTA as a question.

Details matter because they add up to an overall impression of the quality of your work. Think of it as the "Brown M&Ms" principle, if you're familiar with that story. (Google it if you're not, it's a great anecdote.)


One part of effective communication is making things easy to understand and to remove stumbling blocks.

Removing uppercase or dots might still convey the same meaning but making it harder to read.

It may not matter that much but it does matter.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: