> The way most shipping works for most companies today is by going through a brokerage firm, which makes calls to trucking companies and arranges the best deals for its customers. The broker takes a commission of between 15 and 20%. To start, the Uber Freight marketplace will eliminate that middleman and offer shippers real-time pricing of what it will cost to move their goods based on supply and demand.
Yes. Uber Freight is basically a freight brokerage that's being operated at break-even levels:
> UberFreight, which would not control the trucks it relies upon to move customers' freight, is building in only a 5-percent average margin for its net revenue per transaction, according to another person familiar with the matter. On average, net revenue, defined as the revenue a broker generates after its cost of purchased transportation, is around three times that for established brokers. UberFreight's other costs would then be subtracted from its net revenue threshold, leaving the brokerage business either to operate at break-even levels or be a loss leader for the San Francisco-based parent.
So if I'm understanding it properly, they are offering drastically lower prices by cutting out the broker and passing on the savings, but still need the truckers and the truckers will be forced to use them because that's where the jobs will be (not sure if they'll see any pay boost or if it will just be customers seeing savings).
Once Uber gets autonomous trucks everywhere they cut out the drivers and add that revenue to their margins while still under cutting everyone else.
I think Uber realizes if someone else has autonomous tech first, that company will cut out the drivers and they will all be out of jobs. So either way, it doesn't really matter who does it first.
And it's also why Uber is probably running towards getting autonomous tech developed, because ultimately its a fight for it's survival.
In the mean time, they will run transport markets that need people to run it until that tech comes. And it could take 5 years to 20 years for all we know.
I've been guilty of doing that before. Also, from top r/reverseengineering, though that subreddit is a little less traveled so doesn't get as many comments, so it's interesting to read what HNers think.
"The problem lay in a private application programming interface (the slice of code allowing certain outside access) that wasn’t properly checking the person deleting the comment was the same one who posted it, the spokesperson added."
You can't talk about the details of the bug but you can talk about the reward: https://twitter.com/Stephen/status/627190837735239680 The program is legit, they are just very slow (I didn't actually receive the miles until October).
He provides his rational towards the bottom of the post:
> But do we really need a separate template for this? Why not just render everything inside the App component? Yes, you could do it, as long as you are okay with invalid HTML markup and not being able to include inline script tags like Google Analytics directly in the App component. But having said that, invalid markup is probably not relevant to SEO anymore and there are workarounds to include inline script tags in React components. So it's up to you, but for the purposes of this tutorial we will be using a Swig template.
I'm not clear on the "invalid markup" portion. Aren't `data-*` attributes valid for all tags in HTML5? Also, if you really don't want them you can render with `React.renderToStaticMarkup`.
Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/uber-to-launch-uberfreight-fo...