Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | zelos's commentslogin

Regaining the weight quickly after stopping taking the drugs seems reasonably well substantiated? https://www.bmj.com/content/392/bmj-2025-085304

It's not just a US thing. Obesity rates in the UK and Germany are similar and I know plenty of people on GLP-1 drugs in the UK.

Exactly. I disabled internet access on my LG C1 after an update reenabled the setting that pops up adverts over the top of what you're watching.


There's always Gradle Toolchains as well, which allows you to put the JDK configuration in the branch next to the source code.


The iPhone app has weird bugs too. Currently (for me, at least) the brand text that appears in the overlay box on adverts is black text on a black background and virtually illegible. If they're not even worried about bugs in the revenue-generating ad part of the app, what hope is there for the rest?


Pricing always seems to be ignored. Sure, my local council installed chargers in the village car park for people without off street parking, but that’s 50p/kWh compared to 8p for me charging at home.


This. The big inequity around being able to charge at home is the huge difference in price. These slow overnight chargers need to be very cheap to move the needle on EV accessibility.


Maybe, but plenty of people are prepared to poke their fingers in their eyes every morning in order to avoid wearing glasses, so it can't be all that popular a form factor.


Probably because wearing eye glasses signals a handicap whereas this instead could signal being part of an in-group.

Kind of like torn jeans. Before the mid sixties torn clothing would signify economic disadvantage and you’d avoid it if possible but afterwards it signified rebellion and people wanted to signal rebelliousness with torn jeans or at least signal being part of an in-group however large and diluted it be.


> Before the mid sixties torn clothing would signify economic disadvantage

It still does. Absolutely insane to me that people are willing to put on the appearance of being poor, and they think it's cool. You will never catch me wearing ripped jeans, but maybe that's because I grew up poor enough that I had to wear ripped jeans when we couldn't afford new ones.


See, the elites can tell the provenance of the rips at a glance.

Whether it is a high fashion rip of the season, made by artisans, versus some counterfeit rip made at home or in an unlicensed sweat shop versus the unimaginable actual wear and tear of old clothes.


Plenty, but not most. More and more people have accepted glasses now that they've become more fashionable. In fact, anywhere you go, the majority of people are likely wearing glasses if you take the time to notice. They pretty much blend right in anymore, so it's much less noticeable unless you're looking for it.


Both of my kids wanted to need a glasses prescription


That's so wild. Why on earth would anyone want worse eyes? It's a complete pain in the ass. Glasses make people look uglier, you have to keep track of them, they make stuff like 3D movies a pain (cause the glasses don't fit especially well over your normal glasses). I have had glasses since I was a kid and I would love to have been born with healthy eyesight.


Kids see strange things as fashionable. A lot of my kid's (12 year old) friends want braces even though their teeth are straight and healthy. When my kid had to get them, she was the envy of her friend group. -shrug-


Yeah, but apart from all that, what have the Romans ever done for us?


> for every old person we should have more than one working young person.

I never understood this thinking. Doesn't it assume infinite population is possible?


No, it does not. If, for example you define old persons, as persons above the age of 90, you suddenly have many young to old persons.


It's not like people sat down and said "clearly we'll have infinite population and hence a pyramid like scheme for social support for the elderly is ideal".

It was more likely something like "for the foreseeable future we'll have population growth and therefore a pyramid like scheme is a good solution for now".

Ideally the scheme should have already started adapting to the changing population dynamics, but humans for the most part (unfortunately) tend to kick problems down the road.

Politicians don't tend to get rewarded for solving tomorrow's problem when their populace tend to me more interested in having more money to spend right now.

So here we are, living large today with little regard for the cost to our future.


At a steady population number, it just requires people to work for longer than they are retired. Which is mostly already the case.


Occupy Mars!


This suggests ejecting a secondary mirror in front of the craft to reflect light to brake the original craft: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1604.01356:

"...or by ejecting a reflector that is then used as a braking system (similar to thrust reversal on jets) but this only works if the payload is still within illumination range of the primary laser system"


Flipping the sail around would probably be the lightest option, though tricky because the larger sail designs would not be rigid.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: