> Chances are, this happened at least once over the lifetime of the terrorists ownership of the phone - thus we can at least see who they are communicating with, right?
Is that really acceptable to you? Maybe they accidentally screwed up once so it's OK to keep the private affairs of a dead terrorist secret for no good reason?
> Wouldn't that be a good starting point?
I would have thought the best starting point was unlocking the phone, given the owner is dead and committed horrific crimes.
Therefore they have the ability to unlock the phone. I mean I knew people defended Apple here but I didn't think they'd demand logic no longer works to satisfy that.
Is that really acceptable to you? Maybe they accidentally screwed up once so it's OK to keep the private affairs of a dead terrorist secret for no good reason?
> Wouldn't that be a good starting point?
I would have thought the best starting point was unlocking the phone, given the owner is dead and committed horrific crimes.