Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'd say the thing with Occam's razor is that its easier to disprove a simpler answer with less assumptions, thus its easier to place more thrust in it if it does hold up to the same scrutiny as answers that have more assumptions and complexity.

Also, i like Hanlon’s Razor. "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." Generalizing here, but people _are_ stupid.



this is a info for test.. sorry




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: