Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>Except he has no data to show this, and every piece of data i have (and my colleagues have), says that he is wrong.

That's because those data only represent quantitative statistics on code, not whether said code would get great benefits if the programmer actually bothered to make algorithmic adjustments.



Why do you assume we haven't measured what optimal looks like?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: