But what I want to see is proponents of cryptocurrencies acknowledge that the value requires a specific outcome to a yet unproven problem in mathematics(o)
How many people bullish for andor excited by cryptocurrencies know that?
any answer to that would leave you wondering: what are the implications?
If the majority answer: of course I know it could all be found to be worthless tomorrow
Or even if the majority answers: wait, it could potentially be mathematically proven to be useless?
Both leave me wondering what the motivations are for those who are promoting it
I think this is a pretty dishonest way of framing it. It's not just bitcoin, our entire system for secure communications across the internet (SSL/TLS etc.) is built on the assumption that P≠NP.
If someone were able to prove P=NP and come up with a practical exploit that made bitcoin valueless, it would also spell instant death for Ebay, Paypal, Amazon and a few hundred other small companies. Not to mention that all internet banking would have to be taken down very quickly.
In summary, it would be such a huge shock to the economies in all industrialised countries that it would make the 2012 financial crisis look like a minor inconvenience. Nobody would be concerned with "ah shit, my BTC is valueless", they'd be concerned with "ah shit, there's a run on the banks to get physical money and I will probably starve."
How many people bullish for andor excited by cryptocurrencies know that?
any answer to that would leave you wondering: what are the implications?
If the majority answer: of course I know it could all be found to be worthless tomorrow
Or even if the majority answers: wait, it could potentially be mathematically proven to be useless?
Both leave me wondering what the motivations are for those who are promoting it
(o) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collision_resistance