Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This rhetorical maneuver, where you simply declare a system you don't understand to be totalitarian is no different from shouting Nazi at anything you don't agree with. Even a cursory analysis would show that the defining characteristic of totalitarianism, "absolute control over public and private life," doesn't apply to a system where people are completely free to travel anywhere whenever they want and the government invests hundreds of billions to encourage this free travel both within the country and abroad for its citizens.


It's not rhetorics. It's perspective.

* Power structures never favour the weak - it takes a democracy (distribution and separation of powers, education, free speech) to handle that, however imperfect it can be, it's the least imperfect we know as of today. And, there's no prospective new system at play anywhere today.

* Automation favours who controls the machine.

* The state controls the machine.

* No democracy, no control. Failing democracy, no control either.

* That's dangerous.


Free travel? By your own definition China has the defining characteristic of a totalitarian state:

https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/07/13/one-passport-two-syste...

https://eurasianet.org/xinjiang-uighurs-grapple-travel-restr...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: