Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I wonder why they went with something like this rather than a cluster like Percona's XtraDB Cluster that uses Galera replication? You could hang some read-only replicas off of the masters and achieve a similar system?


IMHO, it depends, I assume they mention about NDB Cluster not InnoDB Cluster. If their query using very less normalization, me myself also would choose MySQL Cluster instead.. their concept of auto partition + auto sharding did improve compare to other RDBMS. Plus I believe they should really understood the benefit of Index Condition Pushdown concept which really help a lot on complex query. Just remark, im not from MySQL but already tested several POC comparison on both DB, still MySQL Cluster did stand out a bit yet like i said depends on your transaction design back


Jepsen suggests that XtraDB and Galera don't even come close to working as advertised.

https://aphyr.com/posts/328-jepsen-percona-xtradb-cluster




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: