Runaway stabilizer is a memory item, there should be no reading of the manual involved.
Unfortunately the design of MCAS defeated the checklist of this particular memory item when in lower flight altitudes - which goes back to the argument that the 737 MAX never should have been given the same type rating as the older models.
At the very least it seems that some specific "differences training" on MCAS should have been included. I don't know at what point the differences are enough to require a new type designation.
Runaway stabilizer is a memory item, there should be no reading of the manual involved.
Unfortunately the design of MCAS defeated the checklist of this particular memory item when in lower flight altitudes - which goes back to the argument that the 737 MAX never should have been given the same type rating as the older models.