The damages has been done. It could take hundreds of years and an order of magnitude's financial resources to clean it up land and underground water pollutions. But the air/ocean/atmosphere/carbon footprints are shared and affecting globally.

We should take a break from games and adtech and save the earth.

There's no money in it.

They still have tons of it to dispose of, and still have lower regulations/controls on how it gets disposed of.

And now there is a backlog of recycling plastics in north america that is increasingly likely to get thrown in landfills, some of that may make it to waterways.

Past 10 years, Europe is increasing burning waste for generating electricity, and heat for district heating. Especially Sweden is burning 50% of the waste they generate. Waste plastic makes pretty good fuel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incineration#Incineration_in_E...

And emits CO2. No more plastic, less CO2 from production and from the waste. And it’s clearly our major crisis of the century.

Sweden (5.1) is very close to the world average (4.9 tCO2/capita/year) in fossil CO2 emissions, so they're doing really well for a developed country. (2017 data from Wikipedia.)

There is a caveat in per country carbon accounting. It doesn't include imported goods, nor shipment of those goods. Having said that, Sweden is indeed doing relatively good compared to other developed countries.

Imagine how much better they could do without such high emitting activities

Let me put it that way: CO2 might be mitigated at some point, but plastic in oceans is a lost cause.

Yes, it emits CO2, but is that really a problem? If they didn't burn plastic to produce heat and electricity, they'd likely be burning fossil fuel, which is going to emit probably about the same amount of CO2. Is trash burning really offsetting the use of non-carbon energy sources?

Plastic pollution didn't just happen in the past few months. It's been decades.