> Facebook is the big bad social network that was caught playing with its users' feed to see how it would impact their mood. That is straight evil yet I would be willing to bet it never had any significant impact on their ad revenues.
Yeah maybe my words weren't nuanced enough, I don't have strong feeling regarding that particular event, but it caused outrage yet I'm sure there wasn't any significant impact to the revenue of Facebook.
The study itself was portrayed as evil by most mainstream media that covered it. That's what I meant and my perception of it doesn't matter to the point I was making.
How is this different from AB testing?