Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Rube Goldberg machine of Helm charts

I love k8s but I do want to say that I hate the 'standard' way that people write general purpose Helm charts. They all try to be super configurable and template everything, but most make assumptions that undermine that idea, and I end up having to dig through them to make changes anyway.

I have found much more success by writing my own helm charts for everything I deploy, and putting in exactly the amount of templating that makes sense for me. Much more simple that way. Doing things this way has avoided a Rube Goldberg scenario.



your argument seems to be "its ok if youre rube goldberg"

just wait till you have a predecessor


That's the opposite of my argument. I'm saying that the predominant style is Rube Goldberg, but Helm charts don't have to be written that way. Instead of writing an unreadable mess that is 90% template, just template the 5% that you need, and the whole thing is very readable.


thats what you are hearing. what everyone else is hearing: "_my_ code is self documenting, so obviously its more legible!"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: