Appears to be very very common (as high as 2/3 'with' covid vs 'for' covid). See... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		nsainsbury on Jan 4, 2022 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: No Way to Grow Up Appears to be very very common (as high as 2/3 'with' covid vs 'for' covid). See: https://twitter.com/MonicaGandhi9/status/1478401273317654528

hhmc on Jan 5, 2022 [–]

Surely it can't be a pure binary split of 'for' covid vs 'with' covid.

Having covid presumably worsens outcomes for unrelated causes, in some cases turning a non emergency condition into an emergency condition.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact