Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I waffled on my response to this piece, or rather if it even deserved one.

First of all, you are not disappeared -- just by the mere fact of you being able to post this. Want to give it a go and redeem yourself? Try writing some anti-war stuff in Moscow (you can even join your role-model).

Second, you are not Edward Snowden. And your comparison to him in the latter parts of the article do not do your point any justice. You risk very little by posting this, whereas Mr. Snowden became exiled from his home country by exposing illegal surveillance and is now wanted for treason.

Third, pick better friends and maybe don't work for propaganda outlets? I'm no saint myself, and I understand sometimes you have to put food on the table. But don't claim you're innocent (no snowflake ever feels responsible in avalanche, as the saying goes). Move on, do something better and be remembered for doing good things?



> you are not disappeared -- just be the mere fact of you being able to post this

Exactly. So YouTube no longer has his shows. Doesn't he have his own copies? Can't he post them wherever he wants?


So many people use YouTube as their archive - particularly if they're naive about their relationship with YouTube. He may not have his own copies.

This doesn't necessarily imply total naivety - plenty of journalists would be used to it being the publisher's role to archive the work, not their own.


As a content producer it’s baffling to me when people don’t have local backups of exports and original media. Storage has never been cheaper. 3-2-1 is so easy to implement.


YouTube isn't the publisher in this case: RT is. I would be extremely surprised if they don't have their own copies.


Man you’d be surprised at how bad in-house archiving can be. Especially if they’re working through freelancers.

They’ve probably got it somewhere




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: