The second article has the following subtitle:

> The mania over ride-sharing and delivery companies has at times been absurd

and closes with these words

> In the flywheel economy hope and hype spring eternal, at least as long as interest rates remain low and capital is essentially free.

Hardly an example of what you accused the newspaper of.

So do you have examples of cheerleading or what?

Can you explain to me why these two articles represent Economists being the big cheerleaders for creating bubbles? I read both articles and I'm not sure what I am missing.