@knodi123: You write: "The issues are wattage and whether the radiation is ionizing or not". Wrong. Sorry. You are out of date with the science on this. Weasel-wording like "every reputable study" can't change that.
Its the modulation, polarization mostly, and to some degree frequency that are the culprit.
> Wrong. Sorry. You are out of date with the science on this.
Which science has updated this conclusion?
> Weasel-wording like "every reputable study" can't change that.
Is that a civil way to word things? And why call me a weasel, if one sentence earlier you charitably assumed I was simply out of date?
> Did you even look at the linked study?
Which one - The one you linked? No, I'm not paying $62 to see how they did their review.
The vatican radio thing linked by someone else? Yeah, I did. I replied to the guy who posted it with what I perceive to be some flaws in that study. If you want to discuss it civilly, I'd be interested in that. But not if you're gonna bring this reddit-style "screw you for being wrong" kind of energy.
Its the modulation, polarization mostly, and to some degree frequency that are the culprit.
Did you even look at the linked study?