Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>If having one drink can decompress you after a hard days work, fine, you're not gonna get cancer.

That would seem to contradict the headline, and content, that there's a safe level of alcohol consumption.

In fact, the WHO really takes that claim seriously -- the headline is not a simplification:

>>when it comes to alcohol consumption, there is no safe amount that does not affect health ... Alcohol causes at least seven types of cancer ... "We cannot talk about a so-called safe level of alcohol use. It doesn’t matter how much you drink – the risk to the drinker’s health starts from the first drop of any alcoholic beverage."

But yeah, I agree, in that I'm sure you can find a low enough level of alcohol consumption that can't be discerned in health outcomes. Like, 1 microliter, one time.

It sounds like your comment is more about rejecting claims that there can be a health benefit to alcohol, but the WHO is going much further than that.



"not gonna get cancer" is in no way contradicting the headline. There's plenty of non-cancerous dangers in the world.


Except that a) the WHO says that amount knowably increases cancer risk (and so the author would disagree with the parent's comment), and b) if you just say "it won't have harm X" while not endorsing harms you think it has, you're implying there are no harms. As long as the parent wasn't endorsing the WHO's claim of harm from that level, he's disagreeing with the thesis.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: