Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Consider having to decide between a 20 min trip by car, or 1 hour trip by train, and the car driving has 100x serious accident probability. However, you save 40 minutes if you drive. Likely, driving doesn't take 40 min off your life expectancy. And even if it did, you save the minutes now, and not at the end of your life.


> Consider having to decide between a 20 min trip by car, or 1 hour trip by train

Couple issues with this. First why not a 20 minute trip by car with fees for parking and all that versus a 20 minute trip by train? Depending on where you live this can be your currently daily experience. It could also be anyones daily experience if we just decided we wanted to do that.

The second issue is that simple comparing the surface level time-by-transit misses most of the particulars that matter. And you are also mistakenly applying individual experience with aggregate experience i.e. 40 minutes saved for the individual but in aggregate many people actually do die because of the 100x serious injury probability.


You consider sitting in peace for 40 minutes to be shortening of your life expectancy?

I can emphatize, though, if the feeling corresponds to what I feel participating in this thread.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: