On the contrary, I have spent quite a while considering how to respond to comments like these and this was the best I could come up with. I'm open to suggestions on what I might do instead but I will point out that the current options you've put forward either 1. make it very asymmetric to respond to stupid comments or 2. allow them to proliferate, which drives away and buries interesting conversation.
Responding to "stupid" comments fuels them, so it's better to post nothing. It's certainly much better to post nothing than to post something like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35351862.
Re "allowing them to proliferate", the solution for that is flagging. (In case anyone doesn't know: to flag a comment, click on its timestamp to go to its page, then click the 'flag' link at the top. There's a small karma threshold before flag links appear.) And downvoting, of course (the karma threshold for that is higher). If the comment was bad enough to respond the way you did, why didn't you downvote and/or flag it?
I don't flag comments very often unless they egregiously break the rules, but I've downvoted things like this before. Usually what happens is the person gets upset that they've been penalized by the system if the downvotes stick, or someone comes along and actually thinks the comment is good, and the effects of downranking it are reversed. I don't want to propose that my opinions on comments should overrule everyone else's, but I know you agree that just because people upvote vapid or clichéd content doesn't make it appropriate for Hacker News. So, I haven't really found your solution to work in practice.
What I could absolutely do is sit down and write a long reply about why I think the comment missed the mark, and how it could improve. I have done this in the past too. The problem here is that doing so is a lot of work. My thought process is that most of the people who are posting like this know that they're just posting low quality stuff, and if there's an easy reminder to stop doing that, they will. If they happen to reply with "no, I'm serious, here's why…" then there's no harm done; otherwise it signals (to other people too) that we're looking for something better than that.
I understand that writing a substantive comment can be a lot of work, but how can we be arguing about https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35351862? It was obviously unsubstantive and provocative, and would even probably land as a personal attack. It was even a case of the "vapid and cliché" that you're wanting to counteract.
Downvoting a bad comment is fine. Not posting is fine. If you want to neutrally let someone know that their comment isn't substantive enough for a good HN post, that's ok as long as you're careful how you do it. Dropping an insult on them is never helpful.
I think the next steps here are that I refrain from doing this, continue downvoting, and reach out when I feel it isn't working and have more concrete feedback to provide.
