Yes, it does. Stringing together a narrative and ignoring the proof that contridts your claims is conspiracy theory territory.
> Someone can make a statement like this solely based upon past behavior.
Yet all the evidence (the bug linked) implies nothing of the sort.
> They're merely stating that it is plausible.
I can state that it's _plausible_ that the US government conspired with Disney to fake the Moon landing as a show of power to the USSR in the 60's, but I'd expect to be asked for proof, and I'd expect to be accused of spreading absolute nonsense.
Yes, it does. Stringing together a narrative and ignoring the proof that contridts your claims is conspiracy theory territory.
> Someone can make a statement like this solely based upon past behavior. Yet all the evidence (the bug linked) implies nothing of the sort.
> They're merely stating that it is plausible.
I can state that it's _plausible_ that the US government conspired with Disney to fake the Moon landing as a show of power to the USSR in the 60's, but I'd expect to be asked for proof, and I'd expect to be accused of spreading absolute nonsense.