Does HN really think this? 99% of people will have neutral to negative impact on the world 10 yrs post mortem. None of us are the target audience is this article
The words you wrote make sense but are filled with so many assumptions and beliefs that I actually don't understand what you are trying to say.
For example
> 99% of people will have neutral to negative impact on the world 10 yrs post mortem
What does it even mean to have a negative impact on the "world"? Do you mean a negative impact on humanity? Also, where does the 99% number come from.
> None of us are the target audience is this article
Do you think humanity would be worse off with more people working hard to create and discover things to improve their own lives and the lives of others?
Anyway, your comment is filled with cliche cynicism. Cynicism is a cheap way to appear smart. I think people learned it from TV when they watched tv shows like House or Sherlock.
