Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This isn't effectively freedom. It's just seemingly freedom.

In the end people end up with an addiction and aren't able to release themselves from it, thus it isn't freedom for them.

This logic is simple and coherent.



By that logic we should ban anything remotely pleasurable.


No, because usually other pleasurable things do not harm other like smoking does.

I wouldnt be smoking hater if it had no impact on me.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: