Disagree, those are all valid interpretations, and depending on your experience you will have a vastly different understanding.
To me, the first one is the most basic and frankly, most silly definition of a 10x programmer - produces more code? really? Code sucks. Nobody needs more code, people need solutions. Solving a problem with no more code, or understanding it so a _tiny_ change solves all problems? Way better than adding code, actually much harder to synthesize and produce new results. Way more efficient.
Now can you remove things and solve the problem? Realize you can build an even more simple and generic system that solves your problem? Even more amazing.
