Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It can be a political statement, or it can be about noise and pedestrian safety, depending on the environment.

Basically, it's irresponsible to drive faster than 30 km/h anywhere with a significant number of pedestrians. The risk of serious injury and death rises quickly above that speed, and human drivers cannot react quickly enough at higher speeds. You can justify a bit higher speed limits on major streets with significant traffic, as pedestrians tend to be more attentive when crossing them. But even then, the limit should be 40-50 km/h, as road capacity decreases and noise level becomes unacceptably high at higher speeds.



You missed the point. This law does not distinguish whether pedestrians are present or not.


How could it? How could the law possibly trust selfish drivers to actually judge that sort of thing adhoc and in the moment?

You sound mad. Like a frustrated child. Is it really that hard driving a bit slower?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: