Now, that's apparent the point of the article isn't so clear. The point looks to revolve around this line:
> Eagle-eyed readers might have noticed that this code has no unsafe. Not even a line.
That statement is not really true, as the return type (*T) implies the method is unsafe.
Oh well, it was an interesting bug hunt story.
Now, that's apparent the point of the article isn't so clear. The point looks to revolve around this line:
> Eagle-eyed readers might have noticed that this code has no unsafe. Not even a line.
That statement is not really true, as the return type (*T) implies the method is unsafe.
Oh well, it was an interesting bug hunt story.