I reckon holmium deserved a mention, why is it missing?
To quote Wiki:
"Holmium, like all of the lanthanides, is paramagnetic at standard temperature and pressure. However, holmium is ferromagnetic at temperatures below 19 K (−254.2 °C; −425.5 °F). It has the highest magnetic moment (10.6 μB) of any naturally occurring element and possesses other unusual magnetic properties. When combined with yttrium, it forms highly magnetic compounds."
Very cool, the site's entire 'materials' archives is really interesting as a layman in Materials Science. [0]
This kind of reminded of the sense of wonder of reading through Encarta entries in the late 90's and how I assumed the internet would look like in the future.
That link lists the Piezoelectric Effect near the top. I wondered if there's a corollary for magnetism. I googled the word Piezomagnetic on a whim and was satisfied to find this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezomagnetism
It is quite good. They touch on complex topics but remain understandable and provide sources for further reading. I did not see anything obviously suspect, which is rare in vulgarisation.
Interestingly, the Canadian coins are the same dimensions, but are magnetic. US vending machines used to have a magnet that would deflect Canadian coins into the coin return slot.
When I was growing up near Detroit, merchants took US and Canadian coins interchangeably, and gave both back out as change. But the Post Office was strict about it. I managed to collect a set of King George coins -- at least the smaller ones.
And some Canadian coins used be actual sterling, until they went to 80%ag. I think US coins were always 90.
A few nickels from the early 1940s were, I think, 43% Ag, due to wartime metal shortages.
But man, if you ever find a 1943 copper wheat penny in good to fair condition, you can think about retiring. The 1943 steel penny goes for about < $2.00 on average.
Tungsten carbide is magnetic. I bought a "tungsten" cube from some shoddy Amazon vendor. It's a lot denser than steel, but not as dense as pure tungsten. It is magnetic. The density of the cube is in the range of tungsten carbide.
Pure tungsten carbide is not. You just got some magnetic contaminants in it.
This has is a good test for fake "gold" that can consist of tungsten core with a thin film of gold on top. It's pretty much impossible to get pure tungsten, so such "gold" ends up being magnetic.
The glue to hold the sintered carbide powder is cobalt or iron or whatever pot-metal crap they have on hand for cheap blocks. That would be where the magnetism is coming from. If it's highly magnetic you probably have little tungsten and a lot of binder.
At the microscopic level, what determines whether a given set of valence elections has an excess spin, and thus an excess magnetic moment, is still determined by an empirical set of rules, called Hund's rules, instead of from first principles, iirc:
Good question. The hydrogen atom does have unpaired electrons, but the H2 molecule does not and is diamagnetic. “Standard” solid hydrogen is a molecular solid so it is diamagnetic as well. Liquid H2 is also molecular and should be diamagnetic as well.
I am not really familiar with metallic hydrogen but it would have metallic bonds and delocalised electrons, which can only be the 1s electrons. So the hydrogen atoms would not have any localised electron left, so no (orbital) magnetic moment.
So yeah, I don’t think hydrogen is magnetic in any of its pure forms.
So aluminum and copper are listed as not magnetic yet powerful magnets are used to separate them from non metallic materials in recycling? Seems like a semantic argument.
That kind of phrasing usually indicates someone doesn't understand or is rejecting a meaningful and useful distinction. Is that what you intended to do here?
The article seems to be pretty clear about how there are several different types of magnetism that can be exhibited by materials, and appropriately classifies various materials. Nothing about the existence or mechanism of eddy current separators is a counterexample to anything in the article.
"Magnetism is the class of physical attributes that occur through a magnetic field, which allows objects to attract or repel each other."
Aluminum is repelled by a strong magnetic field, hence the use of ECS, plastic is not. Aluminum is not Ferro-magentic it does however seem to be magnetic depending on the definition.
I'm not a kid, but resemble one when I get a hold of a copper tube and strong neodymium magnet. Probably my favorite toy. I'm kind of glad I have only a kid's understanding of it.
There are very specific about including 'metals' in every statement.
Yep, paramagnetic non metals are: Oxygen (commonly shown on youtube), Nitric Oxide, Boron, Sulfur and some graphites (very slight) due to delocalised electrons.
Iron exists in many different crystal structures in different kinds of steels. Some of these forms are magnetic, others are not. When you work the metal, such as by bending it, you can cause it to change from one structure to another.
304 is an austenitic stainless steel, and austenite is non-magnetic. But when it's cold worked, it turns into martensite, which is harder and magnetic. If you anneal it by heating it and letting it cool, it turns back into austenite.
Martensite is less corrosion-resistant. But note that slight working like bending it a bit will only turn a small portion of it into martensite, most of it will remain austenitic.
Not a physicist, but I’d guess that bending the metal causes it to heat up, which in turn could make it easier for electrons to align and respond to magnetic waves.
To quote Wiki:
"Holmium, like all of the lanthanides, is paramagnetic at standard temperature and pressure. However, holmium is ferromagnetic at temperatures below 19 K (−254.2 °C; −425.5 °F). It has the highest magnetic moment (10.6 μB) of any naturally occurring element and possesses other unusual magnetic properties. When combined with yttrium, it forms highly magnetic compounds."