I've also had a good experience using the 'perf'[^1] tools for when I don't want... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		usrme on Nov 19, 2024 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Hyperfine: A command-line benchmarking tool I've also had a good experience using the 'perf'[^1] tools for when I don't want to install 'hyperfine'. Shameless plug for a small blog post about it as I don't think it is that well known: https://usrme.xyz/tils/perf-is-more-robust-for-repeated-timi.... --- [^1]: https://www.mankier.com/1/perf

vdm on Nov 19, 2024 | [–]

I too have scripted time(1) in a loop badly. perf stat is more likely to be already installed than hyperfine. Thank you for sharing!

CathalMullan on Nov 19, 2024 | [–]

There's also 'poop', which is a nice middle-ground between 'hyperfine' and 'perf'. https://github.com/andrewrk/poop

llimllib on Nov 19, 2024 | [–]

worth mentioning that it's linux-only

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact