Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why not just use Bitcoin Cash? Bitcoin was designed to compete directly with Visa's transaction rate and still can. I don't get why people don't simple use what works?


Why not use Grin? Or Monero? Why would using Bitcoin Cash be better than Bitcoin?


BCH absolutely cannot replicate Visa's transaction rate on L1, at least not without block sizes becoming completely ridiculous


I think it would require something like 200MB blocks, which is within the realm of possibility.

The only thing stopping you from adding payment channels on top of that is transaction malleability, but I am not really caught up on the topic.


That still means the chain is growing by 28GB every single day, so 10TB a year.

That's arguably past the point where running a small node is viable, so I would argue you're well into the territory of losing some of the decentralisation properties you want in a cryptocurrency


10TB/yr is like $100-200/yr of hard drives and this price will continue to decrease. Compare this to the transaction fees for a small buisness accepting bitcoin and you will find that it is reasonable. Especially when you consider that reasonably efficient miners start at thousands of dollars.

small nodes don't matter. They can prune or shard the blockchain.

What matters is the economics of medium-sized nodes that are operated by small buisnesses. These are are the entities that have material reasons to run a full node (to accept transactions in an automated manner while preventing theft), and these are the entities that evaluate the rules of the cryptocurrency at the time of transaction.


The reason bitcoin is so successful is exactly because people don't know how it works.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: