It is true that larger organizations have economies of scale but smaller groups and individuals have more flexibility and can pivot easily.
I dont think access to tech is any different (significantly that is) at the top than itnis at the bottom. Feature sets are more austere (8 out of the 10 functions maybe that they really need) for individuals and small groups, but less wasteful, at the top they're richer but more wasteful (hundreds of features maybe but you only really need 10). The bigger you are the worst value for money because you pay for a lot of stuff you dont need which cancels out the economies of scale in my opinion because you have to pay so much for such a small edge.
Getting more out of less is better than getting less out of more.
I dont think access to tech is any different (significantly that is) at the top than itnis at the bottom. Feature sets are more austere (8 out of the 10 functions maybe that they really need) for individuals and small groups, but less wasteful, at the top they're richer but more wasteful (hundreds of features maybe but you only really need 10). The bigger you are the worst value for money because you pay for a lot of stuff you dont need which cancels out the economies of scale in my opinion because you have to pay so much for such a small edge.
Getting more out of less is better than getting less out of more.