Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My understanding is battery life. I have no idea how accurate this is, but somebody basically graphed what I was thinking: https://techboards.net/threads/power-curves-of-a17.4348/

You put a bigger chip in so you can run it at lower power consumption levels. Essentially, there are two ways this can pan out:

* Overall utilization can remain lower, keeping it in a more power efficient band.

* Expensive actions complete faster, thus using less power (since they run for less time).

From an overall business perspective, there also doesn't really seem to be a reason to _not_ standardize the lineup on a single chip. I have to imagine is less overhead from a manufacturing standpoint and it's not like there's a particularly meaningful difference in manufacturing costs of these chips.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: