Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> pointed at internal gatekeepers who mainly seem to say no to product releases.

I've never observed facebook to be conservative about shipping broken or harmful products, the releases must be pretty bad if internal stakeholders are pushing back. I'm sure there will be no harmful consequences from leadership ignoring these internal warnings.



When I worked there (7 years), the gatekeeper effect was real. It didn’t stop broken or harmful, but it did stop revenue neutral or revenue negative. Even if we had proven the product was positive to user wellbeing or brand-favorability.

Yes I’m still bitter.


Why would a business release a revenue negative product? Stopping engineers from making products that dont contribute to the bottom line is exactly what these gatekeepers should be doing


Because you don't have perfect foresight.

Something that loses money now can be the next big thing. ChatGPT is the biggest recent example of this.

I had seen chatbot demos at Google as early as 2019.


Because due to that mindset now FB sucks and no one wants to use it anymore?


FB ad serve up 10% yoy but no is using it?


Correct, they don't know yet that their platform is dead, but it is. Most of those are bots.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: