Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah, I don't remember having done that either. But I've often had changes where the merge failed because of un-checked-in changes, and then it was convenient to be able to run `git merge` after checking in the changes rather than `git pull` because it didn't need to talk to the remote.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: