Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What was fallacious about my OP?

He asserts that being poor is different from being broke. The former being tied to a permanent state.

But, if you have the skills and opportunity to make better-than-poor money, then in most cases, I presume, you aren't really poor. It's only a matter of time until you can make additional money. And if you need to charge the $300 of parts to your credit card, on the presumption that if you have a running vehicle you can go to an interview of do the next landscaping job, you have a reasonable expectation of being able to pay it off. It's an investment in that case.

There are all kinds of reasons why you might find yourself poor anyway for reasons outside your control. Health issues, weird economic situations, whatever. I'm not discounting them. And maybe they apply here.

I just feel like there is a disconnect between the earning potential of the skills he has and being truly "permanently" poor. I'm not arguing there isn't a legitimate reason, just that it wasn't clear to me what that reason would be.

You may not like the reasoning or think I'm being too critical, but it's hardly fallacious.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: