Well the article talks about a surprise billing law which already protected the patients, but why should insurance companies (and thus you through premiums) have to pick up the cost?
I want to be able to put pressure on hospitals to accept a whole set of insurance and I'm glad insurance companies are doing so.
There SHOULD be a guy saying "we should make sure his providers are all in network" at the hospital and not just make the insurance company write blank checks to anesthesiologists.
Totally agree - this is what I'm saying also. Reality is hospitals still have an incentive (which we see them exercise a lot esp. in rural areas) to stay out of network where they can so that they can bill claim amounts freely.
I want to be able to put pressure on hospitals to accept a whole set of insurance and I'm glad insurance companies are doing so.
There SHOULD be a guy saying "we should make sure his providers are all in network" at the hospital and not just make the insurance company write blank checks to anesthesiologists.