No it’s not. It’s sarcastic, snarky, sneery content that appeals to a certain group.

The actual subject matter has already been covered well by good writers like Matt Levine, WSJ, and others.

> No it’s not. It’s sarcastic, snarky, sneery content that appeals to a certain group.

What on earth does your second sentence have to do with the quality of the writing? Try just a bit to separate your emotions from the text.

How does it not have anything to do with the quality of the writing? The writing is supposed to convey some facts, but it's too busy pushing narratives and layering on snark that it fails to convey real facts. Even in this comment section the people who applaud the article don't really understand what's happening because they soaked up so much of the narrative-pushing from the article.